We have a bigger audience then aRev, so why couldn't the developers figure out a way to remove aRev servers this way there are less cheaters. If cheaters wish to join 4D1 the anti cheat can simply ban them. This way we get less cheaters and a cleaner community. Whats your opinion on this?

Users can already turn off legacy servers on the serverlist filters.

Users can already turn off legacy servers on the serverlist filters.

I forgot to add that.

Anyways I am asking for this so at we can have less cheaters / kids coming to the forums and being like " OMGZ HAXORSSS "

Users can already turn off legacy servers on the serverlist filters.

 

Paulo but the users can't force their favorite servers to block arev players now can they ?

If NTA was to issue a warning then a couple weeks latter severe the connection the community would be better for it .

It's up to the dedicated server hosts to decide if they want the cheaters filling their servers or not.

set sv_master2 ""
set sv_master3 ""

It's up to the dedicated server hosts to decide if they want the cheaters filling their servers or not.

set sv_master2 ""
set sv_master3 ""

Or at the least option to allow arev players shouldn't be the default if the host wanted the arev players he should be able to let them play but sometimes (by ignorance ) they can't stop them . If you guys would make the option to block arev players the default while still leaving the option , i would be more than happy (not demanding or requesting just making an observation ) .

We must assume that dedicated server hosts are smart enough to know those commands...

Happens that most of them just want to have the servers filled, no matter if it's cheaters. Quantity over quality... as players, you should search and promote good quality servers.

And leave those "anything goes" servers for cheaters only.

Not that easy the good servers are normal full or have bad pings i can think of only 3 servers i can get playable pings and are 4d1 exclusive . And then there is the old dilemma not everyone plays the same thing i for 1 like domination and free for all maybe a little tdm . And not all server owners like that , but diversity is good except when only a couple of servers are enjoyable and none of them agree with you on what a fun gametype is .

I think, what is it — error. I can prove.

 

What?

4D1 servers are just better beause of demo recording and less cheaters. If 4D1 continues with arev servers all we end up getting is a smaller amount of people playing on 4D1 servers (so finding a lobby where you can record and stay for long instantly becomes harder), and more cheaters. Honestly I can't see the good side of having servers from a bad host in between the 4D1 ones.