Probably old news for some of you, but I just watched this video and I found it amazing. Might be interesting if you haven't seen it yet.

 

Its amazing, definitly a big improvment over UE3.

 

 

I hope it gets used as much as the old one did.

Unreal... destroys.

Its amazing, definitly a big improvment over UE3.

 

 

I hope it gets used as much as the old one did.

It...it...looks...like...a... cutscene...

Yep, but it isn't. It's real time rendering.

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

What if it would be pretty optimized ?

It's unreal how cool this looks.

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

What if it would be pretty optimized ?

I hope so , i wish it will be . But i doubt it .

The graphics looks nice, it can be a great game though

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

What if it would be pretty optimized ?

It'll be more than optimised thanks to consoles.

i cant wait.........are there any games that are planning on using this yet?

i cant wait.........are there any games that are planning on using this yet?

There is one, forgot the name.

Also with Unreal 4 coming out, I think we can all agree that computer graphics has reached its full.

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

Unreal has always had very good optimization, even my 580 can run any UE3 game at UL7RA, usually >90fps

Little off-topic but here's a quick comedy video comparing graphic engines.

 

Gets funny about halfway through.

Here's my take.

 

Unreal > A potato > IW > Frostbite

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

 

actually GTX 680 can run it at 60 fps

Here's my take.

 

Unreal > A potato > IW > Frostbite

 

> IW>Frostbite

 

 

Hah, no.

snip due to the post by tatar making me happy

http://www.polygon.com/gaming/2012/3/8/ ... ias-kepler

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digit ... l-engine-4

 

The UE4 demo is running on PC, specifically an Intel Core i7 processor with an NVIDIA GTX680 and 16GB of RAM - what Epic terms a standard development box.

A bit of high-end, but achievable.

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

 

Dont worry unreal engine was always one of the best optimized engines.

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

Unreal has always had very good optimization, even my 580 can run any UE3 game at UL7RA, usually >90fps

At 1080 not some silly 4:3 resolution that you have.

It looks good but ( completely speculating here ) it requires some pretty beefy hardware i doubt a even a 680 would run this at 60 fps in 1080 .

Unreal has always had very good optimization, even my 580 can run any UE3 game at UL7RA, usually >90fps

At 1080 not some silly 4:3 resolution that you have.

>implying resolution makes any real difference in ue, especially on a 580

ha, if I run at 640*480 I get about 3 fps more

Unreal > iDT > GoldSrc > Source > Potato > IW > Frostbite.

Unreal > iDT > GoldSrc > Source > Potato > IW > Frostbite.

Source > Everything else