... it's just one small damn change. Really, how can one line of code being changed explicitly 'alter the game too much', and completely change the game dynamics? It can't. And then again, many of the complainants had their reason for complaining set as 'a game-altering change'. Many other games are changed weekly, and then complaints also occur, and the change is tweaked for better balancing. IW changed many parts of the game itself themselves in early patches, but they've stopped doing that. If we can fix some of the things they forgot to patch, or perform other balancing changes, why shouldn't we? The original goal of 'providing an IWNet emulator' has been passed months ago, and without any new changes the project would die. In fact, the current goal is improving the game from the most-complained changes done after CoD4, both code changes and small gameplay changes currently. Until dedicated servers come around, sadly, there's not really a choice of what tweaks you want to apply or not, and game-altering tweaks were in fact done from the first day on, by changing the 'playlist' rule lines from the original files provided by IW.

 

-- me, 2010-08-17, 09:08Z

wut?

wut?

 

Another one of NTA's games Or maybe just random posting Nevertheless, people are going to have heavy debates over the implications of this...whatever this is.

wut?

 

Another one of NTA's games Or maybe just random posting Nevertheless, people are going to have heavy debates over the implications of this...whatever this is.

No, this is clearly about changes to the IW4M project. (well, actually the aiw project since look at when he came up with it).

NTA's feeling bored. //Ithink//

NTA's feeling bored. //Ithink//

He's trying to hit us with nostalgia real hard.