(my personal opnion is that this is just like mw2 at the beginning, an overhyped game)why does this forum feel like one big Bf3 comercial??Am I the only one who is noticing this?

i choose both :C

bf3 are good(/bad) games on their own way.

You can't just compare a fast-paced quick funny shooter with full of hackers with an tactical based (most people don't get that) long lasting, team play based game

FaceHunter":146trlzi]You can't just compare a fast-paced quick funny shooter with full of hackers with an tactical based (most people don't get that) long lasting, team play based game

looks like you got an obvious preference though

FaceHunter":3oncmukx]You can't just compare a fast-paced quick funny shooter with full of hackers with an tactical based (most people don't get that) long lasting, team play based game

looks like you got an obvious preference though

 

well i sometimes like the fast game and sometimes dottlefield

Currently no FPS have a fully tactical team. Snipers who play tactically get called campers and those who use an BR as a DM rifle also get called camper. Most FPS players play spray n pray without thinking. And OP: BF3 makes many computers lag unless your using an expensive high-end computer. While COD can be supported by mid-range computers with minor lags. Hackers are all the same. Though they prefer hacking in servers where ppl will rage, and COD has a lot of these players. Not to mention that IW*M is *cough* while BF3 requires a large amount if wanted to be played with only one disc in a family or a group of friends.

To summarize, COD is more user friendly while BF3 is more complicated.

OnASideNote: Battlefield 3 is the only game that wins the COD series. Any other Battlefield games before BF3 are almost the same as playing COD 1

And OP: BF3 makes many computers lag unless your using an expensive high-end computer.

 

PS3 wooh!

...

ok i'll leave now

I have bf3 and it is way better then bf bc2 but i dont think it can compare with cod ... well whatever it would be good to have it done but i dont think that it would have as many players as cod does (personal opinion) 8-)

And OP: BF3 makes many computers lag unless your using an expensive high-end computer.

Bitch please, I don't have a high-end computer but I can still run it at a steady 50 FPS.

Any other Battlefield games before BF3 are almost the same as playing a popular FPS series 1

It seems you have never played any other BF games from their series.

BF3 makes many computers lag unless your using an expensive high-end computer.

 

HD6670 2GB DDR3 and a D820 2.4GHz @ 800x600 with somewhat medium settings and I get 110FPS indoors, and 80FPS outside. Suck it.

BF3 makes many computers lag unless your using an expensive high-end computer.

 

HD6670 2GB DDR3 and a D820 2.4GHz @ 800x600 with somewhat medium settings and I get 110FPS indoors, and 80FPS outside. Suck it.

Weird, my processor is almost the same while my GPU is an ATI HD6750 but my framerate is a bit lower than yours.

BF3 makes many computers lag unless your using an expensive high-end computer.

 

HD6670 2GB DDR3 and a D820 2.4GHz @ 800x600 with somewhat medium settings and I get 110FPS indoors, and 80FPS outside. Suck it.

hd9550 (not shure 100%) ddr3 2x2gb 3.2ghz dual core in 800x600 and settings at high(maybe i dont remember) ,well it lagged as shit in the beta , and the pyrated singleplayer(early on the game release in 1920x1080) that i downloaded lagged like shit on that fighter plane mission, the other missions lagged if i played more than 1h(cuz of the shitty fan-colling system)

-did the fps rate get any better?, i know there was alot of updates

i prefer call of duty, but i can see why many prefer battlefield