All 3 of them. Discuss.

Reasons?

 

Reasons?

 

He says that every game he doesn't like sucks, so get used to it

I don't find something good about the game, it's a generic near future FPS.

 

About the SP: I stopped to play when I saw "United States Marine Corps" or whatever. BORING

About the MP: Meh

 

So, why should I be interested... because a new version of it is coming out?

Played the beta. Boring.

Crysis 2 and 3 is ghey. The SP is not the same as the Crysis 1 SP. Open World and so on. The MP is ghey, because itВґs the same as Call of Duty.... In Crysis Wars you have the mode PowerStruggle, but in C2 and C3 not.

first one was ok, the newer ones are terrible.

first one was ok, the newer ones are terrible.

I agree.

Crysis 3 is terrible.

The gameplay is exact the same as crysis 2(inb4 cod)

First of all, I bought all Crysis games, and they all have shitty MP, atleast for me.

 

Crysis SP was kinda OK, nothing special but it was surely one of the most interactive and interesting tech demoes. Yes, that's what Crysis games primarily are, tech demoes.

 

Crysis Warhead had an awesome SP. The experience of playing as a British was much more interesting than American, plus all the joy of British accent. "I'm British you muppet!"

 

Crysis 2 was a failure, SP headed another way, more towards CoD series. It had some cool cutscenes/quick time events, but that's all.

 

Looking forward to try C3.

I'd like to think like that - the original Crysis and Crysis:Warhead are one thing, and Crysis 2/3 are another.

I will start with the original ones, because they are quite the same.

First of all, back in 2007, the game was an unoptimized peace of shit(I presume it still is, hardly you will find a PC to run it with 60fps smoothly and sadly, most modern games require quite the up-to-date PC to run smoothly). Not only that, but the highest tier video card back then(8800GT) still couldn't run it properly(lots of texture glitches, random freezing). Although the things were a little bit better for Warhead, still - mainly on the same level.

Now, when we cut the bullshit, to talk gameplay and visuals. Haven't run Crysis and quite some time, but still I don't think there is a game, that looks better, especially if you run some mods on it. The gameplay is in some way standart for a FPS, but the Nano suit modules change it a lot and make you adapt to the current situation. People say the game is a sandbox one, but I don't agree - it is the same as the original Far Cry - you have one large level, in which you must go from the beggining to the end. Yes, those levels are massive, you can take the long way up the mountains, clearing enemies from far away, you can grab a armored vehicle and go ham on the main road or you can swim silently, getting quite a shortcut. The weapons feal great - you start with one of the best assault rifles, but you hardly will find any ammo for it until later on the game progression. Depending on your Nano suit status, you will have different recoil on all of them. Also, you can modify every weapon(except the Alien ones) to your choosing - different scopes, barrel and underbarrel attachments. And they are not predifined, if you find a sniper scope on the level - you can use it on any gun. The difference in them is quite significant - silencers really aid your stealth, but reduce inmensly your gun damage. Storyline - well, nothing spectacular, but still - there are a lot of interesting moments which complete the gameplay quite well. For Warhead - the story has a little bit more role, but nothing significant. You control another charecter, being on the opposite end of the island as the original hero. Missions, objectives, levels - the same formula as the previous one. The gameplay has changed a little bit to more frantic one, more action packed, and sadly for an expansion - shorte

In the multiplayer there are only 3 modes, but are enough on my opinion(there were some community mods of most of them, and they worked quite well). They were TDM/DM and the interesting part was that you start with a pistol and find guns/ammo on the level itself. To remove campingness, players quitting stealth mode were with highly reduced health/no armor. The other mode was Power Struggle - something like Battlefield's conquest/CoD's Domination. The maps are really big, and sadly the max players were 32(I think there were modded servers with more, but eh...). You start with some vehicles and you fight to control a lot of bases, and they do matter. Last night in BF3 I captured a point on the map, saying "Anti Air Site" and there were just a small tower and a few building. In Crysis/Wars if you capture an Airstrip, you gain access to Helicopters/VTOLs, which you can buy with points which you earn through the game, there are no pre-sets. If you capture a Sea Base - you can buy Boats and Hovercrafts, Army Base - Better Weaponry and Heavy ground vehicles. The multiplayer has a lot to offer and was a lot of fun. Sadly, there are hardly any vanilla game modes now - with only max 10 populated servers, they are full with stupid modifications, and a lot of hackers.

Now Crysis 2 is really different from the original. The singleplayer follows the same formula, and while the levels are large, they are really thin and a tiny bit more vertical to suit better the city levels. The game is much better optimized, but the gameplay is quite simplified. Almost no vehicles for the exception of a jeep and a tank, the Nanosuit is also simplified to two functions - power and stealth, while it was better divided in the original one. I really disliked that aspect of the game, but whatever... The multiplayer was CoD with invisible poeple - there were more modes, but sadly less players per maps and the maps were tiny, compared to the original ones. Being restricted to class pre-sets and attachments on a gun made the game seem the same a lot of the time, where there were not a single moment in C1. If someone hasn't played Crysis 1, he would see Crysis 2 as a really good game, and it is in fact - strong single player campaign, regular for a modern fps multiplayer. But in my opinion, it had nothing to do with Crysis 1 and is different in a lot of ways.

Now, after trying Crysis 3 Alpha, I can say that it feels more like Warhead to Crysis 2, rather than a next title of the series. The interface is the same, the graphics are the same, the sound is the same, the models are the same, I have yet to see a clear difference. Yes, there is a Battle Mech in multiplayer, there are a few alien weapons on the level, but I can feel it only as a Crysis 2 DLC, let alone an expansion, not to talk to a next title. The sad prediction for me is that EA will continue to milk their FPS franchises in the same way - one winter MOH, the other BF, somewhere in the spring Crysis. Although none of them are bad games, they definately are a step back to the original ones and are quite hard to enjoy, knowing what they could do with the current technology.

 

Final opinion: Crysis 1/Warhead are one of my favourite games of all time. I feel Crysis 2 as a different one, not a bad game, but definately nothing like the original. Yes, Crysis 3 will be like Crysis 2 in a lot of ways, but this isn't always the best thing.

^ i didn't read anything

^ I banned this user for this post.

^ I banned this user for this post.

lol

 

ontopic: i liked crysis 1 before they put aliens into the game......it was more fun destroying the small camps, and punching the bad guys way up into the air......and the free roam feeling....

the others are fun for about 1 hour....

Crysis 1 and Warhead is good but 2 is console port and crysis 3 is same shit.

^ I banned this user for this post.

lol

 

ontopic: i liked crysis 1 before they put aliens into the game......it was more fun destroying the small camps, and punching the bad guys way up into the air......and the free roam feeling....

the others are fun for about 1 hour....

 

You discover aliens in the end of the first level.

I agreed.

Because Crysis seems to be TECH DEMOS rather than a real game to play.

Don't agree crysis 1 and warhead were extremely fun and the nanosuit gave some unique gameplay .

The second one didn't bother , when i found out it left the jungle I just didn't bother . You can't have a environment as big as a jungle on a city .

Reasons?

 

He says that every game he doesn't like sucks, so get used to it

This is the truth^

 

I played Alpha, it was okay. I got 60 fps most of the time, unoptimized, but well, it is alpha. It is really easy to adapt to the game, eventhough I have never played any other Crysis MP-s.

^ I banned this user for this post.

lol

 

ontopic: i liked crysis 1 before they put aliens into the game......it was more fun destroying the small camps, and punching the bad guys way up into the air......and the free roam feeling....

the others are fun for about 1 hour....

 

You discover aliens in the end of the first level.

yes, but you dont really get into them until later....