I really never buy DLC. When it comes to DLC I go with the motto called "You get what you paid for" So I payed $60 for MW3 and I should get everything that involves the game MW3. That means the new Map Packs.

Also I am not expecting for BF4. Something tells me that the way EA is following Activision footsteps they are gonna mess the game up or even worst make us pay more for some stupid addon. I mean really DICE did just start making BF4? You should of made BC3. Battlefield series are suppose to release every 4-5 years not every year in my oppinion it should of been like how many years it took between BF2 - BF3 not every year it really washes the game out just like the MW series. So would I pay more for Addon Content? No I already paid for the game not give me everything that works with the game.

Battlefield series are suppose to release every 4-5 years not every year in my oppinion it should of been like how many years it took between BF2 - BF3 not every year it really washes the game out just like the MW series.

 

But the new consoles are coming out soon-ish, so maybe they want to release shortly after that to take advantage of the better processing power/graphics etc

No. They just compete with Activision. Which is a losing battle.

Say NO. to dlc!

They actually are spending a little more time on the PC version, there will be an FOV slider and lean in the game. Its nothing much but at least they realize how shitty MW3 PC was.

If the DLC maps were actually good and would provide good gameplay yes. Otherwise...no.

Magicka DLC pack. That was the only thing I bought.

Now, The only DLC I bought were the ones for Batman Arkham City.

Now the question is, what about expansion packs? Are they DLCs too?

DLC is downloadable content, seeing as how I don't use physical media I don't have problems with DLC per se.

I dislike the way current DLCs work (i.e. offering you little content for a lot of money at the detriment of the community)... expansion packs are traditionally paid and they should be payed as DLC. They (usually) offer a tonne of content and I am more likely to buy an expansion pack rather than a mini-mini-mini-mini expansion pack or just a game add-on which is the majority of today's DLC.

i like those games, where updates actually come with free patches

Depends on how much content it actually adds. For instance, GTA IV DLCs were well worth it. CoD DLCs are mostly not worth it.

i like those games, where updates actually come with free patches

 

Dat BUMP

 

I only ever bought Dlc's BF games. Like Road to Rome, Secreat weapons of WW2 for BF1942, Special forces for BF2, Viethnam for BC2 and Premium for BF3. Whatcha gonna do im a battlefield lover

I miss the days where map packs are free.

I miss the days where map packs are free.

this.....

 

sometimes i dont mind paying for some dlc.....like if its about $1 or $2 for some cars/guns.....or something that i know will last a long time(larger dlc)

I always buy the DLCs and I'm not sure why I buy them. I think it's because I want the "full version" of the games I like.

But I completely agree with UL7RA. Why can't the other companies do it like Valve? They update their games regularly, release free content and for example a level editor for portal 2.

Hey guys, just a PC gamer here with a question.

 

Have you ever bought DLC or will you consider buying DLC? Doesn't matter the game or the DLC type.

It may be maps or guns, and if you are a Battlefield player it may be both, but the very notion of paid DLC is insulting to me. I'd rather have mod tools + map editor.

 

It's bad enough that MOST companies charge for DLC, what we have now is Day 1 DLC, and we are going to use BO2 as an example. Let's say that they have a 1 year development cycle (which they do) and by that time they have to create decent versions for the PC, XB360 and PS3 and nobody's foolin nobody - XB gets done first, and the PC port always sux... now what they have is Day 1 DLC for people who have pre-ordered the game, you will be able to download Nuketown 2025 this means that they plan to have a decent version of the game AND free time to create DLC. I mean WTF. OPTIMIZE THE PC VERSION MORE, WE KNOW YOU WONT, BUT AT LEAST TRY... TRYING IS WHAT YOU ARE GOOD AT.

 

CoDs idiotic style of rolling out new maps just splits the community and since PC users don't get DLC, even if you get the DLC - nobody plays it, so you are stuck. I am strictly boycotting this shit, NO DLC of any kind shall be purchased by me. If something gets released - it gets released for all of us - free of charge.

 

You know what EPIC did with UT3? Released mod tools (as usual) + free DLC in terms of maps and gametypes, vehicles, etc. It was included with some fixes they borught in. This shit got me to buy Unreal Tournament 3 although I was able to play it with a pirated copy and they don't support it anymore. They show PC love - I show PC love.

 

So yeah. NO (paid) DLC!

Battlefield 2 and 2142 had expansion packs which they later released for free as part of a major game update. That was back when EA didn't suck dick.

Battlefield 2 and 2142 had expansion packs which they later released for free as part of a major game update. That was back when EA didn't suck dick. didn't know how much more they could earn by making DLCs paid.

That explains the lack of mod support.

so, T6 DLC will come with weapons wich will most likely be overpowered, and so changes the game into one of the free pay2win games where you have actually payed 50 euro's for