and wouldn't that be easily bypassable as well?

Also, patch means less players.

BAD.

 

Or we make a new Forum Group called "Gamer" or something like that, and everyone who want to play must post a screen of the game on steam...

How does that relate to Jeremychs post again?

 

1. Site is external.

2. Patch is external.

3. Not officially endorsed by staff.

4. NO PROBLEMO.

Hmmm...

How does that relate to Jeremychs post again?

 

Public spam?

 

Only a suggestion...

That gamer group is also a OHREALLY, I DOUBT IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN type thing.

Whats bad is if Craptivision Finds out about this, "Patch" , Which is "Supposedly" Suppose to be a secret, which isnt being kept very well...

 

Well, is there a steam check officially?

There is.

 

Period.

 

We can't take responsibility(as 4d1 community) for patches made by people from other forums/not staff

Whats bad is if Craptivision Finds out about this, "Patch" , Which is "Supposedly" Suppose to be a secret, which isnt being kept very well...

 

Well, is there a steam check officially?

There is.

 

Period.

 

We can't take responsibility(as 4d1 community) for patches made by people from other forums/not staff

But seeing as jeremychs site endorses it... (just having a gmod endorsing it on an external site to an external site to an external link can make Activision mad... But I guess your right. They can't do anything)

Excuse me, what patch are you guys on about?

 

No discussion about such things here, thanks.