Look closely

 

Spawn server (mp_dome, sd) complete.
-----------------------------------
]scr_testclients
"scr_testclients" is: "0" default: "0"
 Domain is any text
]scr_testclients 18
]scr_testclients 2
]status
map: mp_dome
num score ping guid                             name            lastmsg address               qport rate
--- ----- ---- -------------------------------- --------------- ------- --------------------- ----- -----
 0     0  999                 0110000100083b2c gamesmatrix        4700 92.96.155.147:3074 (idx: 0) 1954 25000
 1     0  999                             bot0 bot0               2850 00000000.000000000000:0    1  5000
 2     0  999                             bot1 bot1               2850 00000000.000000000000:256    2  5000
 3     0  999                             bot2 bot2               2850 00000000.000000000000:512    3  5000
 4     0  999                             bot3 bot3               2850 00000000.000000000000:768    4  5000
 5     0  999                             bot4 bot4               2850 00000000.000000000000:1024    5  5000
 6     0  999                             bot5 bot5               2850 00000000.000000000000:1280    6  5000
 7     0  999                             bot6 bot6               2850 00000000.000000000000:1536    7  5000
 8     0  999                             bot7 bot7               2850 00000000.000000000000:1792    8  5000
 9     0  999                             bot8 bot8               2850 00000000.000000000000:2048    9  5000
10     0  999                             bot9 bot9               2850 00000000.000000000000:2304   10  5000
11     0  999                            bot10 bot10              2850 00000000.000000000000:2560   11  5000
12     0  999                            bot11 bot11              2850 00000000.000000000000:2816   12  5000
13     0  999                            bot12 bot12              2850 00000000.000000000000:3072   13  5000
14     0  999                            bot13 bot13              2850 00000000.000000000000:3328   14  5000
15     0  999                            bot14 bot14              2850 00000000.000000000000:3584   15  5000
16     0  999                            bot15 bot15              2850 00000000.000000000000:3840   16  5000
17     0  999                            bot16 bot16              2850 00000000.000000000000:4096   17  5000
18     0  999                            bot17 bot17              2850 00000000.000000000000:4352   18  5000
19     0  999                            bot18 bot18               850 00000000.000000000000:4608   19  5000

]sv_maxclients
"sv_maxclients" is: "20" default: "20"
 Domain is any integer from 1 to 20
]nice 
gamesmatrix: bot????

>still caring about this shitty game

>still caring about this shitty game

> mw3 and mw2 being almost the same so you can obviously port it

 

Don't you appreciate contribution?

Awesome too bad you are a faggot

>still caring about this shitty game

You're a gmod on a community that focuses mostly on 2 projects, one of wich you call "shitty"...

That's what I call depression.

 

@zxz0O0: this seems promissing, as other scripts that you've done so far. I'm mostly interested in how much can you increase sv_maxclients

>still caring about this shitty game

You're a gmod on a community that focuses mostly on 2 projects, one of wich you call "shitty"...

That's what I call depression.

 

@zxz0O0: this seems promissing, as other scripts that you've done so far. I'm mostly interested in how much can you increase sv_maxclients

Well, IW5M is not that good itself. But nowadays its almost unplayable. Thats why.

I've set it to 20 just for testing. Also this requires patching the server and client, for now I've only done the server part (as you can see in the snippet above 20 clients connected successfully). The reason I chose to 'start' with this on MW3 was probably because I've worked more with MW3 than with MW2 (reversing), although it shouldn't be a problem to adopt it to MW2 (that's also planned).

>still caring about this shitty game

You're a gmod on a community that focuses mostly on 2 projects, one of wich you call "shitty"...

That's what I call depression.

 

@zxz0O0: this seems promissing, as other scripts that you've done so far. I'm mostly interested in how much can you increase sv_maxclients

Well, IW5M is not that good itself. But nowadays its almost unplayable. Thats why.

 

Well you should promote your projects otherwise you are not doing any good to the community and you should leave

>still caring about this shitty game

You're a gmod on a community that focuses mostly on 2 projects, one of wich you call "shitty"...

That's what I call depression.

 

@zxz0O0: this seems promissing, as other scripts that you've done so far. I'm mostly interested in how much can you increase sv_maxclients

Well, IW5M is not that good itself. But nowadays its almost unplayable. Thats why.

 

Well you should promote your projects otherwise you are not doing any good to the community and you should leave

Should he?

I think he's a Global Moderator, not a Global Promoter

>still caring about this shitty game

You're a gmod on a community that focuses mostly on 2 projects, one of wich you call "shitty"...

That's what I call depression.

 

@zxz0O0: this seems promissing, as other scripts that you've done so far. I'm mostly interested in how much can you increase sv_maxclients

Well, IW5M is not that good itself. But nowadays its almost unplayable. Thats why.

 

Well you should promote your projects otherwise you are not doing any good to the community and you should leave

So I cant state my personal opinion? Mkay.

Cool zxz0O0, could you play with 20?

Cool zxz0O0, could you play with 20?

 

Well that's what he is working on I suppose.

I like it.

Thought I would provide a status update here; I'm still working on it.

 

I'm mostly interested in how much can you increase sv_maxclients

Currently I can increase it up to around 30clients until I reach the limit for child0/child1 variables (which can be patched ofc but is hard). After that limit I know of another one which is around ~70 (3bytes lea cmd, etc.). And the third would be 256 (2bytes push cmd, etc.).

 

So first the good news:

 

Working:

• Run server with increased maxclients (server)
  
• Join server with increased maxclients (client)
  
• Play with more than 18 clients (client)
  
• Kill player > 18 (client)

 

Not working:

• Clients > 18 are invisible (client)
  
• Scoreboard only shows 18clients (client)
  
• Menu sometimes handles weird (client)
  
• Occasional crashes (client & server)

The 'Not working' list is ordered in its priority.

 

After it's working the todo list will be (in its priority):

• Clean up code
  
• Make code better readable
  
• Test and adapt to IW4M

 

And lastly NTA will add it to the full release.

 

Doesn't seem anyone is interested though..

 

Doesn't seem anyone is interested though..

 

 

Nice work, I'm sure a lot of servers would be interested in this if this was published to the actual IW5M client, but how would you do that?

nooo don't either do that, actual IW4 and IW5 would be unplayable with more than 18 clients, IW4 maps can handle those 18 people, but hell IW5 maps are way better playing with 12 clients...

nooo don't either do that, actual IW4 and IW5 would be unplayable with more than 18 clients, IW4 maps can handle those 18 people, but hell IW5 maps are way better playing with 12 clients...

 

It's still interesting to see how it works, and it would be a real test on how spawns and other systems would work with extended client numbers. Also, we haven't actually tested any of the games with the amount of clients being noted as possible in this topic, so we really can't say that.

nooo don't either do that, actual IW4 and IW5 would be unplayable with more than 18 clients, IW4 maps can handle those 18 people, but hell IW5 maps are way better playing with 12 clients...

 

It's still interesting to see how it works, and it would be a real test on how spawns and other systems would work with extended client numbers. Also, we haven't actually tested any of the games with the amount of clients being noted as possible in this topic, so we really can't say that.

 

Well IW3 wasn't fun with more than 24 people and IW4 is getting messy with 18 people so I'd say it'd surely be unplayable...

I'm interested but I'm also interested in it for IW4M :> (if you need testers hit me up on steam).

nooo don't either do that, actual IW4 and IW5 would be unplayable with more than 18 clients, IW4 maps can handle those 18 people, but hell IW5 maps are way better playing with 12 clients...

 

It's still interesting to see how it works, and it would be a real test on how spawns and other systems would work with extended client numbers. Also, we haven't actually tested any of the games with the amount of clients being noted as possible in this topic, so we really can't say that.

 

Well IW3 wasn't fun with more than 24 people and IW4 is getting messy with 18 people so I'd say it'd surely be unplayable...

 

Well, some IW3 maps like Crossfire were playable. And of course, you have the new maps/weapons coming to IW4

I hope NTA will find a way to regulate the player amount to a reasonable one because having too much players ends up in shitty servers...

I hope NTA will find a way to regulate the player amount to a reasonable one because having too much players ends up in shitty servers...

 

I have to say I disagree. If he were to do that, hopefully it would be because of an approaching game error of some sort, and not to enforce law.

All of your statements are personal opinion(choice). In my personal opinion, choice is exactly was the server host's should have. That's the entire reason I use 4D1.

This ain't The Old Hammer & Sickle. Pun intended.

I hope NTA will find a way to regulate the player amount to a reasonable one because having too much players ends up in shitty servers...

 

I have to say I disagree. If he were to do that, hopefully it would be because of an approaching game error of some sort, and not to enforce law.

All of your statements are personal opinion(choice). In my personal opinion, choice is exactly was the server host's should have. That's the entire reason I use 4D1.

This ain't The Old Hammer & Sickle. Pun intended.

well nobody likes 64 player metro in bf3 yet people host it, just because they can

 

hell, even with 18 players iw5 maps are meatgrinders with retarded spawns.

 

IW4 would be more appealing, with Rush concept for example

Well I have to agree, 64 is too much, but I think it's cool to have the option to choose.

IW4 would be more appealing, with Rush concept for example

 

 

This, I can imagine a 64 player server with full, open and large SP maps with a domination/conquest-like gametype.