Some cheats are bypassed/undetected/whatever, can we ban some obvious cheaters like those:

 

If so, how can we ban those alterRev fags (reverse project synthesis is bad, just bad, as those fucks don't have any anti-cheats imho)?

watch out for my air support!

No, only gmods and NTA can ban cheaters, since it requires ACP access

Well, then I have acp access, as I have the Banning tab in the mcp.

I think the real questions is: Are we supposed to ban cheaters?

Well, then I have acp access, as I have the Banning tab in the mcp.

 

My fault, you don't need ACP, just UCP - ucp.php?i=profile&mode=profile_info - at the bottom.

 

Non ACP view of user profile - http://i.jeremych.com/d34488.png

ACP view - http://i.jeremych.com/8ad57b.png

 

Also

Well, then I have acp access, as I have the Banning tab in the mcp.

 

My fault, you don't need ACP, just UCP - ucp.php?i=profile&mode=profile_info - at the bottom.

 

Non ACP view of user profile - http://i.jeremych.com/d34488.png

ACP view - http://i.jeremych.com/8ad57b.png

 

Also

Random, are you using Windows 8?

Well, then I have acp access, as I have the Banning tab in the mcp.

 

My fault, you don't need ACP, just UCP - ucp.php?i=profile&mode=profile_info - at the bottom.

 

Non ACP view of user profile - http://i.jeremych.com/d34488.png

ACP view - http://i.jeremych.com/8ad57b.png

 

Also

Random, are you using Windows 8?

The ACP on phpbb looks like that on every pc

http://gyazo.com/e240b4a8a1279a5ee86c5a1b17e9ff51

Random, are you using Windows 8?

 

No, but http://www.skinpacks.com/modules.php?na ... r=0&sid=43

Banning someone for using text-spam?

I'm pretty sure the policy for that was no ban. (dot-hook anyone?)

Banning someone for using text-spam?

I'm pretty sure the policy for that was no ban. (dot-hook anyone?)

wieter was banned afaik. And wasn't that just a spam text?

this text spam is from hax though

Wieter and kidebr spam was declared as "Advertising Cheats" and was a bannable offense on aIW then.

Shouldnt we do the same here?

Banning someone for using text-spam?

I'm pretty sure the policy for that was no ban. (dot-hook anyone?)

 

It was aIW multihack or something like this (I use it in aRev a lot)

Some retards can't turn the textspammer off.

this text spam is from hax though

Still, text spam is allowed.

this text spam is from hax though

Still, text spam is allowed.

oh?

this text spam is from hax though

Still, text spam is allowed.

oh?

Are you saying dot-hook is bannable?

this text spam is from hax though

Still, text spam is allowed.

oh?

Are you saying dot-hook is bannable?

 

uh im not talking about the text spam, but multihack which includes text spam. That faget was using aimbot for example

You could record him using aimbot/wh and then ban him.

That would be an option, but I guess several people are strictly against manual banning.

In my opinion we should be allowed, but we must share the proof on staff channel, if other staff agrees, banhammer.

 

and what's the point of that?

The cheater makes a new account, effort is void.

Also, proof? Seriously?

Also, proof? Seriously?

+1

 

 

Time consuming and useless.

But banning without proof would result in arbitrariness, as we had at aIW.

But banning without proof would result in arbitrariness, as we had at aIW.

But I (we) trust in you being responsible. So if you say he cheated, I believe you.

But banning without proof would result in arbitrariness, as we had at aIW.

But I (we) trust in you being responsible. So if you say he cheated, I believe you.

 

So we are allowed to ban them manually ? Even though it's kinda useless.

But banning without proof would result in arbitrariness, as we had at aIW.

But I (we) trust in you being responsible. So if you say he cheated, I believe you.

Heh, the same thing we thought at aIW. Until some people just went crazy and ragebanned without a proper reason.