JoeyB":2jiu81fk]With this we could add the weapon 'source' straight into the .ffs or into their own .ffs, can't we? Then load them as a dependency stand-alone (without the undeeded textures and such).

Doesn't this also mean we could load the missing entities (etc) on singleplayer maps into multiplayer ones?

What 'Missing entites'?

JoeyB":3iy9b9ja]

This 'side-thing' seems like a big project, props if you suceed.

Well it is; I think the way he implied it was that he had something else he was working on as a higher priority.

Maybe aCI3 (since from what I recall he had started on it anyways), the maps from a popular FPS series:OL, or even a whole other game? I just think the way he referenced to it reveals to us he's working on something else.

 

Or I could be utterly wrong and he could mean it as he is working on this in his free time. I guess no one really knows; just putting out my "thoughts."

Seeing as he is NTA, he could have completed all of that, but is just 'sitting on the code' ;p but, yes, I do agree with you.

JoeyB":3koun2cz]With this we could add the weapon 'source' straight into the .ffs or into their own .ffs, can't we? Then load them as a dependency stand-alone (without the undeeded textures and such).

Doesn't this also mean we could load the missing entities (etc) on singleplayer maps into multiplayer ones?

What 'Missing entites'?

Well not "missing" I suppose, but whatever causes all the red FX to appear. I guess I don't really know whether they're entities or not (as I haven't really done anything at all with the SP/MP maps other than dumping the .d3dbsp.ents of a couple).

Hopefully that makes sense.

 

Then we could play the maps or "port" them over easier I believe (just adding spawn points then), maybe? Like I said at the moment I don't know much about the process of porting the maps over other than you have to change spawns and replace "entities" in the .d3dbsp.ents with ones from other maps (which we have to use as dependencies for them to work).

YEAH BABY

Better believe it, man.

i like where this is going, how do we compile these anyways

once its released? :>

Oh that's awesome! Can we compile d3dbsp files too?(Completely custom maps!)

 

 

 

Can't wait! Reminds me cod mod tools. . http://haax.in/s/oge.png

Not only does this mean new weapons and maps and other things like that, it means A LOT less memory will be needed to do these kinds of things than what is currently needed.

 

Does that mean doing stuff like new maps/weapons/camos etc will be easy thing like in COD4?

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

Rule 1 or 2 apply here at all?

only if someone knows what he/she doing?

That :>

 

Nice, let's hope that everything is going to work fine...

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Seems quite interesting...

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Agree.. I hope 4D1 will support campaign officialy, will be cool if nta add ability to load gsc's in singleplayer like in iw4m... )

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Agree.. I hope 4D1 will support campaign officialy, will be cool if nta add ability to load gsc's in singleplayer like in iw4m... )

afaik we will never touch SP.

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Agree.. I hope 4D1 will support campaign officialy, will be cool if nta add ability to load gsc's in singleplayer like in iw4m... )

afaik we will never touch SP.

only .ff-s

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Agree.. I hope 4D1 will support campaign officialy, will be cool if nta add ability to load gsc's in singleplayer like in iw4m... )

afaik we will never touch SP.

only .ff-s

If we see SP support, it would probably be through running a private match that loads the SP fastfiles and runs the campaign there.

^ Rendflex and me maybe finish it when this thing released:) CooP SP without fx thingy

Not only does this mean new weapons and maps and other things like that, it means A LOT less memory will be needed to do these kinds of things than what is currently needed.

 

Does that mean doing stuff like new maps/weapons/camos etc will be easy thing like in IW3?

 

Sorry I wasn't specific enough, I was talking about the *new* weapons that were already in IW4 (M40A3, M60E4, R700, Dragunov, W1200, Colt45 (M1911), PP2000 Thermal, M4A1 SOPMOD, Free Runner knife, and a few more that I cannot think of).

 

What I meant by the new maps was, CaII of Duty: Online's maps in IW4.

 

Not Custom Content.

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Agree.. I hope 4D1 will support campaign officialy, will be cool if nta add ability to load gsc's in singleplayer like in iw4m... )

afaik we will never touch SP.

only .ff-s

If we see SP support, it would probably be through running a private match that loads the SP fastfiles and runs the campaign there.

dont forget sp menufiles & scriptmenus if they can ofc

XModels have always been strange to me. Much harder to figure out than materials. Do they even have a qhandle header?

XModels have always been strange to me. Much harder to figure out than materials. Do they even have a qhandle header?

Yeah, the problem is that most the xmodel assset is pointers to other structures of undetermined size and not just straightforward data, which is a pain in the ass to figure out.

SO basically, is this side thing the fact that you will be able to put single player weapons into a single .ff, which you can use as a dependency to not use any more ram than maybe 5mb extra?

SO basically, is this side thing the fact that you will be able to put single player weapons into a single .ff, which you can use as a dependency to not use any more ram than maybe 5mb extra?

 

yup I think that's the aim of this stuff.

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Agree.. I hope 4D1 will support campaign officialy, will be cool if nta add ability to load gsc's in singleplayer like in iw4m... )

/developer 1

use your "raw"-folder like "m2demo"

working since releasedate

Hm Rendflex with this finish coop single player

 

Yeah, that would be cool

Agree.. I hope 4D1 will support campaign officialy, will be cool if nta add ability to load gsc's in singleplayer like in iw4m... )

/developer 1

use your "raw"-folder like "m2demo"

working since releasedate

Yeah, already used it several times, coop campaign

XModels have always been strange to me. Much harder to figure out than materials. Do they even have a qhandle header?

Yeah, the problem is that most the xmodel assset is pointers to other structures of undetermined size and not just straightforward data, which is a pain in the ass to figure out.

Oh gee, that sounds like fun.

 

Wait, did I say qhandle header? Isn't that just an int? GG brain.